Surrey residents woke up this week to two separate public safety warnings — each announcing the release of a high‑risk violent offender into our city. According to the Surrey Police Service, Jonathon Anders Muzychka and Skylar Wayne Pelletier, both designated high‑risk offenders with histories of serious violent offences, will now be living in our community.
Two releases. Two days. One city expected to absorb the risk.
This is not acceptable.
Surrey is home to more than 700,000 people — families, children, seniors, and workers who deserve to feel safe in their neighbourhoods. Yet once again, Surrey is being asked to accommodate individuals who pose a significant risk to public safety.
Both Muzychka and Pelletier are subject to:
Extensive court‑ordered conditions
Electronic monitoring
Curfews
Ongoing police oversight
These conditions exist because authorities believe these individuals present a real and ongoing risk. And still, Surrey is chosen as the placement location — twice in two days.
Residents have every right to ask: Why Surrey? Why again?
Rehabilitation Matters — But So Does Fairness
I fully support rehabilitation. Successful reintegration must be part of any responsible justice system. But rehabilitation cannot come at the expense of community safety, nor should one city be repeatedly selected to house offenders who pose elevated risks.
Surrey is not a dumping ground for high‑risk placements.
Reintegration must be shared fairly across jurisdictions, not concentrated in a single community that is already managing rapid growth, complex policing challenges, and significant demands on social services.
Muzychka and Pelletier are not welcome in Surrey, and residents are justified in saying so.
 |
| Skylar Wayne Pelletier |
 |
| Jonathon Anders Muzychka |
